Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. Janice Brewer

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 2, 2017No. 15-15307Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

*979BERZON, Circuit Judge,

Concurring in light of the Dissent from the denial of rehearing en Banc:

I join the panel opinion in full. I write in concurrence to further explain our holding in light of the dissent from denial of rehearing en banc.

I write first to emphasize that the “law” that has preemptive power over Arizona’s policy is Congress’ conferral of exclusive authority on the executive branch to defer removal of individuals who lack legal status and to authorize them to work while temporarily permitted to remain. Furthermore, I write to highlight that the preemption issues ultimately…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Mathews v. DiazSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API