Legal Opinion
Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. United States Department of Energy
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 16, 2001No. CIV.A. 98-1670(GK)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KESSLER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Fees and Expenses of Plaintiffs James K. Phillips and the Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, AFL CIO (collectively “OCAW”). Upon consideration of the Motion, Opposition, Reply, and the entire record herein, for the reasons discussed below, the Motion for Fees and Expenses [# 28] is granted in part and denied in part.
1. Background
The United States Enrichment Corp. (“USEC”) was created in 1992 as a wholly owned government corporation charged ■with producing enriched uranium at two…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Covington v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Save Our Cumberland Mountains, Inc. v. Donald P. Hodel, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re USEC Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- MACTEC v. OneBeaconDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2007
- Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Stone v. ThompsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001