Legal Opinion
Matter of Water Supply Critical Area
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 18, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
233 N.J. Super. 280 (1989)
558 A.2d 1321
IN THE MATTER OF WATER SUPPLY CRITICAL AREA NO. 2.
EVESHAM MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY AND WILLINGBORO MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY, APPELLANTS,
v.
THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 30, 1988.
Decided April 18, 1989.
Before Judges KING, BRODY and ASHBEY.
Edward A. Kondracki argued the cause for appellant Evesham Municipal Utilities Authority (Davis, Reberkenny & Abramowitz, attorneys).
Ronald E. Bookbinder argued the cause for appellant-intervenor Mount Laurel…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Henry v. Rahway State PrisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Campbell v. Department of Civil ServiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- City of Hackensack v. WinnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Gloucester Cty. Welfare Bd. v. NJ CIV. SERV. COMM'N.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Skeer v. EMK Motors, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Adoption of NJAC 7: 26BNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Chemical Industry Council v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection & EnergyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Public Interest Research Group v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991