Legal Opinion

People v. Kendrick

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 10, 2006No. 04CA2156PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge GRAHAM.

Defendant, Maurice Dee Kendrick, appeals the order denying his Crim. P. 35(c) motion for postconviction relief. We affirm.

In March 2002, defendant pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery, a class three felony. As part of the plea agreement, defendant stipulated to a fifteen-year sentence in the Department of Corrections (DOC) and agreed that he would not file any Crim. P. 35(b) motions seeking a reduction in his sentence. Following a Crim. P. 11 advisement, the trial court accepted the plea and sentenced defendant to fifteen years in the DOC, plus five years of mandatory…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Lopez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  4. Martin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  5. Craig v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. OsorioColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. People v. TrujilloColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. People v. AGUILAR-RAMOSColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. State v. HegglandHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. HegglandHawaii Supreme Court · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API