Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Heggland

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 2008No. 27755Published

1Concurrence

Concurring opinion by

ACOBA, J.

I concur in the result but additionally believe that the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA) did gravely err (1) in applying the holding of State v. Sinagoga, 81 Hawai'i 421, 918 P.2d 228 (App.1996), to this case because Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee Gregory Heggland (Petitioner) challenged the validity of his alleged prior conviction, State v. Heggland, 116 Hawai'i 376, 382, 173 P.3d 523, 529 (App.2007), and Sinagoga has been limited to uncounseled conviction or identity challenges, see State v. Veikoso, 102 Hawai'i 219, 227 n. 8, 74 P.3d 575, 583 n. 8 (2003);…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Lopez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  4. Craig v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  5. State v. FreitasHawaii Supreme Court · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API