Legal Opinion

Arlt v. King

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1950No. Docket 25, Calendar 44,558PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, C. J.

The parties in this case are owners of lots in Huron Pine Beach, a platted subdivision of resort property on Lake Huron, in Iosco county. The bill of complaint was filed to enjoin the defendants from violation of claimed building restrictions by the defendants’ use of their lots, to compel the defendants to remove from their lots all cottages in excess of 1 cottage on each lot, and to prevent the use of said lots for commercial purposes. After a hearing on the merits, the court held that said lots were restricted to use for residence purposes only, with but 1 residence on each lot, that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Sanborn v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Nerrerter v. LittleMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Sipes v. McGheeMichigan Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grange v. KorffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  2. Reed v. WilliamsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Swartz v. LaurencelleMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Buckley v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Cooke v. TaubeMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API