Legal Opinion

T & W Investment Company, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation v. Thomas Kurtz

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 18, 1978No. 77-1611PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOGAN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises out of a civil action brought by T & W Investment Company, Inc. (T & W) against Thomas Kurtz (Kurtz) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Kurtz was a receiver appointed by an Oklahoma state court for T & W and a related corporation, Tulsa Whisenhunt Funeral Home, Inc. (Tulsa Whisenhunt). The allegations were that Kurtz, acting as receiver of the corporations under color of state law, took T & W’s property without due process, without just compensation, and in violation of its rights to equal protection. The specific complaint was that certain items of tangible…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Kermit Construction Corp. v. Banco Credito Y Ahorro PoncenoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  4. Bradford Audio Corporation v. Edward Pious, Individually and as Purported Receiver of Bradford Audio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  5. Smallwood v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Davis v. BaylessCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Mays v. SudderthCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. John S. Pleasant v. Larry Lovell, Larry Hyatt, Vernon Pixley, Kenneth Batson and Tim FortuneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. Property Management & Investments, Inc. v. Gerald A. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API