Legal Opinion
Kermit Construction Corp. v. Banco Credito Y Ahorro Ponceno
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 29, 1976No. 76-1242PublishedCited by 119 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFIN, Chief Judge.
Appellant charges in his complaint that the defendants, a bank, a construction corporation, and a court-appointed receiver, conspired to put the corporation into receivership and so avoid paying a corporate debt to appellant. The complaint points to a few procedural flaws in the receiver’s appointment as evidence of conspiracy. Since the complaint was filed in June, 1975, the case has followed a tortured path to this court. The receiver moved to dismiss in October, 1975, but mistakenly sent a copy of the motion to the wrong post office box. Appellant, naturally enough, did…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Dennis v. SparksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dr. Gladys Cok v. Louis CosentinoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- John T. Henry and Evelyn I. Henry v. Farmer City State Bank, an Illinois Banking Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- LeBlanc v. SalemCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.