Judkins v. Ross

VAN NORTWICK, Judge.

Michael Judkins seeks review of an order of indirect criminal contempt which was entered after the lower court found that Jud-kins had violated the terms of an injunction restraining Judkins and appellee, Randy Ross, from exhibiting or discharging firearms in each other’s presence. Because the order of indirect contempt fails to specify the facts and circumstances constituting Judkins’ contemptuous conduct, as required by Rule 3.840(f), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and because the petition on which the order is based was neither sworn to nor supported by an…