Legal Opinion

Pioneer Engineering Co. v. Cardillo

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1947No. Civil Action No. 6041Published

1Opinion of the Court

BARD, District Judge.

In considering the present motion to dismiss, the complaint, it is not the function of this Court to re-weigh the evidence which was presented to the Deputy Commissioner at the hearing held on March 12, 1946. The sole question presently before the Court is, was there substantial evidence upon which the Deputy Commissioner could base the findings which he made? Southern S. S. Co. v. Norton, 3 Cir., 1939, 101 F.2d 825; McCarthy Stevedoring Corporation v. Norton, D.C.E.D.Pa., 46 F.Supp. 26; Bernatowicz v. Nacirema Operating Co., 3 Cir., 1944, 142 F.2d 385; Oldman Boiler…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Twin Harbor Stevedoring & Tug Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  2. Burley Welding Works, Inc. v. LawsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  3. Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HoageCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  5. Southern S. S. Co. v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API