Legal Opinion
Heien v. Archstone
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided September 14, 2016No. 15-2299PPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LISI, District Judge.
The Plaintiffs in this class action are former and current tenants of residential property in Massachusetts leased to them by Defendants Archstone and several related entities. In their suit, the Plaintiffs challenged certain “amenity use fees,” which, they alleged, were imposed by the Defendants in violation of the Massachusetts Security Deposit Statute, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 186, § 15B, and Chapter 93A of the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 93A, § 1 ei seq. The underlying litigation having long been resolved with a complete settlement between…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Vicor Corp. v. Vigilant InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Gay Officers Action League v. Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thomas & Betts Corporation v. Alfa Laval, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- Mongue v. The Wheatleigh CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2026
- VEILLEUX v. ELECTRICITY MAINE LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020
- VEILLEUX v. ELECTRICITY MAINE LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020