Legal Opinion
Losleben v. California State Life Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 31, 1933No. Docket No. 687PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
On a former appeal in this case (119 Cal. App. 556 [6 Pac. (2d) 1012]), this court in reversing a judgment of nonsuit summarized the facts as follows:
“The plaintiff is the widow of George Phillip Losleben, who held an insurance policy issued by the defendant. This policy provided for the payment of $2,500 in the event of death resulting from natural causes and for an additional $2,500 ‘in the event that the death of the insured is caused by bodily injuries effected exclusively and wholly by external, violent and accidental means, said death occurring within ninety days after the happening of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Rock v. Travelers' Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Lickleider v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Ogilvie v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Horton v. Travelers InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ritchie v. Anchor Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Evans v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Weil v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Cox v. Prudential InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Griswold v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.