Legal Opinion

Berry v. Howell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 21, 1941No. 2 Div. 177PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The original bill, and as amended, sought an accounting to establish payment of mortgage indebtedness, and was submitted to the court on complainants’ willingness to do equity and abide by the decree of the court with reference thereto and to pay any sum of money that might be found due on said mortgage indebtedness. It was averred that they were ready, able and willing to do equity in this respect.

The property was foreclosed and all the parties in interest to that, including the purchaser at mortgage foreclosure sale, were made parties to the suit.

The decree from which the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ivy v. HoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  2. In Re FiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Lewis v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. City of Bessemer v. GoodwynSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. Wilkerson v. SorsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Webb v. GriffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. Fuller v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  3. Aiken v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. Lukes v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  5. Hamilton v. City of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API