Van Loan v. Septa
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
1Opinion of the Court
FORER, J.,
— This case raises an issue of first impression in Pennsylvania with respect to section 108(n) of the Pennsylvania Occupational Disease Act of June 21, 1939, P.L. 566, secs. 101-503, as amended, 77 P.S. §§1201-1603. Claimant, an employe of defendant Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA), contracted chronic bronchilitis, peribronchile fibrosis and bronchiolitis obliterans as a result of inhaling fumes of hydrochloric acid in a caustic tile cleaner. Defendant, while admitting the etiology of the illness, disputes that it falls within the ambit of section 108(n).
Bef…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Lelenko v. Wilson H. Lee Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- UTTER v. Asten-Hill Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Mills v. Detroit Tuberculosis SanitariumMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Canterna v. United States Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.