Legal Opinion

Van Loan v. Septa

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided November 3, 1977No. 611Published

1Opinion of the Court

FORER, J.,

— This case raises an issue of first impression in Pennsylvania with respect to section 108(n) of the Pennsylvania Occupational Disease Act of June 21, 1939, P.L. 566, secs. 101-503, as amended, 77 P.S. §§1201-1603. Claimant, an employe of defendant Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA), contracted chronic bronchilitis, peribronchile fibrosis and bronchiolitis obliterans as a result of inhaling fumes of hydrochloric acid in a caustic tile cleaner. Defendant, while admitting the etiology of the illness, disputes that it falls within the ambit of section 108(n).

Bef…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Lelenko v. Wilson H. Lee Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  3. UTTER v. Asten-Hill Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Mills v. Detroit Tuberculosis SanitariumMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Canterna v. United States Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API