Legal Opinion

Travelers Property Casualty Co. v. Schoenheimer

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1998Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Herman Cahn, J.

Petitioner Travelers Property Casualty Co. (Travelers) seeks to stay arbitration proceedings sought by respondents Pierre and Idee Schoenheimer, and to require a hearing regarding *826respondents’ allocation of the proceeds of a personal injury settlement, which petitioner labels as “deceptive”.

Respondents were involved in an automobile accident. Pierre Schoenheimer was operating the vehicle, which belonged to Meyer German, his father-in-law. Idee Schoenheimer, Pierre’s wife, and her parents, Meyer and Beatrice German, were passengers in the vehicle. The car was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eagle Insurance v. BattershieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Country-Wide Insurance Co. v. DoneroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API