Davidson & Case Lumber Co. v. Motter
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
POLLOCK, District Judge.
This is an action at law, brought by the Davidson ■'& Case Lumber Company, as plaintiff, against defendant as collector of internal revenue, to recover income and excess profits taxes paid by plaintiff under the income excess and war profits tax provisions of the Revenue Act of 1918 (40 Stat. 1057). All conditions of the law precedent to be had and done by plaintiff to enable it to bring and maintain this action have been done and performed. The questions raised for decision in order to determine the rights of the parties may be briefly stated, as follows:(1) Did the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Shwab v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Geo Feick & Sons Co. v. BlairCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
- Bulger Block Coal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
- Stieff v. TaitDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1928
- H. H. Hornfeck & Sons, Inc. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Zenith Milling Co. v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.