Lundgren v. Hoglund
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy
In this case we decide that spendthrift provisions in a trust are valid in Montana, and that judgment creditors of a beneficiary under a spendthrift trust may not execute upon the proceeds due from the spendthrift trust to the beneficiary before distribution by the trustee.
First Interstate Bank appeals from a judgment of the District Court, Eleventh Judicial District, Flathead County, which ordered the bank as trustee to pay to judgment creditors the income due to the beneficiary of a spendthrift trust. We reverse.
There are four issues on appeal. First, does the Bank have standing to appeal?…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Nichols v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Wetmore v. . WetmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Canfield v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Erickson v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Tisdale v. Wheeler Bros. Grain Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re ConroyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 1990
- Mahan v. MahanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Breidenbach v. WedumMontana Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re UllmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 1990