Legal Opinion
United States v. Joseph Horovitz
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 9, 1978No. 76-3287PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Joseph Horovitz alleges the Government breached its plea bargain. The Government contends it adhered to what it thought was the agreement. In light of this factual dispute about the terms of the bargain, we vacate and remand.
Horovitz was named along with seven others in a multicount indictment on March 10, 1976. 1 Specifically, he was indicted in Count One for conspiracy to transport stolen automobiles in interstate commerce, 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 371, 2312, and in Count Twelve for the receipt of a stolen automobile knowing it was stolen, 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 2, 2313. He originally pleaded not guilty to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Geisser v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- William Johnson v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. BynumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Lester J. Millet, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Andrew Jackson RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Eleas Dabdoub-DiazCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Joseph HorovitzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Andrew Jackson RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978