Legal Opinion

United States v. Bynum

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 26, 1978No. Nos. 76-2973, 76-3085, 76-3015PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAY, Circuit Judge:

I. INTRODUCTION

This decision encompasses numerous issues and numerous defendants involved in three trials in the district courts in Florida. The reason for their consolidation in one opinion is the existence of a common defendant who allegedly headed interstate auto theft rings operating in three cities in Florida' — Lakeland, Tampa, and Miami. We will discuss each case separately with references to the others where necessary. Reference to each case will be either by its case number or its location.

II. 76-2973 LAKELAND

In January, 1976, a federal grand jury in Tampa,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  2. United States v. Ronald Berkowitz, Paul D'alessandro, Kevin Van Coughnett, Bisan Vafaie, and Wendall HowellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. Lenin Juarez and Oscar JuarezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Joe B. Butler, David R. Holmes, Donnie WaitesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Will RenfroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API