Doten v. Halby
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
NEESE, District Judge.
This is a diversity action. 28 U.S.C. § 1332. It is stipulated that at the time of the accident herein involved and at the time of the institution of this action: (a) the plaintiff was a citizen of Tennessee, (b) the defendant Mr. Halby was a citizen of New Jersey, and (c) the defendant corporation was incorporated by Delaware, was not incorporated by Tennessee, and had its principal place of business in New Jersey. These stipulated facts are sufficiently supported by the pertinent pleadings, as amended, herein.
The defendant Radio Corporation of America, Inc. now seeks a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harrison v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. City of ParkersburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Nyberg v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1954
- Kenny v. Duro-Test CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1950
- Markwood v. Southern Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee · 1895
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dozier v. Alliance Global Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024