Legal Opinion
Stewart v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 31, 1943No. Nos. 143, 144PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Appellant was tried and convicted on two informations. One information charged that appellant “being then and there the driver of a certain public vehicle for hire did drive and operate said vehicle without first having obtained a license so to do.” The other information charged that appellant “being then and there the driver of a certain public vehicle for hire, did fail while transacting business to display a current insurance sticker.”
The facts seem undisputed. Appellant is the owner and operator of a taxicab and on the occasion in question was driving the taxicab on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Buck v. KuykendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Hall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Van Dam v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
- Clifton v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jenkins v. Black & White Cab Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1953
- SILVER v. McCAMEYCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Yirenkyi v. District of Columbia Hackers' License Appeal BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Green v. SilverDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1962
- Silver v. McCameyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955