Clark v. Public Utilities Commission

The plaintiffs in error seek to reverse the order of the commission as unreasonable and unlawful, upon two grounds:

First, that the record shows no proof of public convenience and necessity to be served by the granting of the certificate to Waldron & Son.

Second, that, even if such convenience and necessity have been shown, the plaintiffs in error, Lloyd Clark and Boyd Clark, doing business as Clark Trucking Company, were entitled to sixty days time to increase their service, pursuant to Section 614-87, General Code.

The first ground goes to the question of the weight of the evidence. There were…