Legal Opinion

Mercantile Trust Co. v. Kanawha & O. Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of West Virginia

Decided July 13, 1889PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Equity. On petition for ancillary proceedings.

1Opinion of the Court

Harlan, Justice.

The hill filed in this court, May 4, 1889, by the Mercantile Trust Company, and which was spoken of in argument as an “ancillary bill,” shows that that corporation has heretofore filed in the circuit court of the United States for the Southern district of Ohio, Eastern division, “a bill of complaint against the Kanawha & Ohio Railway Company, a corporation created and existing under and by virtue of the laws of,the states of Ohio and West Virginia, and having its principal officer, at Columbus, in said state of Ohio, and at Charleston, in said state of. West Virginia, seeking…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Muller v. DowsSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Compton v. JesupCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  2. Coltrane v. TempletonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1901
  3. In re BrantU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1899
  4. Greene v. Star Cash & Package Car Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1900
  5. McCandless v. FurlaudCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API