Legal Opinion

Morgan v. County of Yolo

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 29, 2006No. 2:03CV2228MCEJFMPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ENGLAND, District Judge.

Through the present lawsuit, Plaintiff Dave Morgan (“Plaintiff’) seeks judicial determination that enforcement of his Employment Contract with Defendant County of Yolo would violate the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (“FLSA”) as well as the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and various state laws.

Both the County of Yolo and the remaining named Defendant, Sheriff E.G. Prieto, now move for judgment on the pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) 1 on grounds that the County has dismissed, with prejudice, its lawsuit…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  4. City of Erie v. Pap's A. M.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Kremens v. BartleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. In re Live Concert Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
  2. Rli Ins. Co. v. City of VisaliaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
  3. Nichols v. HarrisDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
  4. Fitbit, Inc. v. AliphComDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
  5. (PC) Garraway v. CiufoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API