Legal Opinion

Carden v. George

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 10, 2009No. SD 29623PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL E. SCOTT, Chief Judge.

Appellant Carden, pro se, appeals the dismissal of his malicious prosecution suit against the Phelps County Prosecuting Attorney (“Prosecutor”). His briefs suffer deficiencies similar to those in Carden v. City of Rolla, 290 S.W.3d 728 (Mo.App. 2009), for which we dismissed that appeal. We justifiably might do the same here, especially given Appellant’s history of briefing violations, 1 yet we exercise our discretion to consider Appellant’s claims as we discern them.

Background

Prosecutor was served with Appellant’s petition on July 14, 2008. She sought and obtained…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Southers v. City of FarmingtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  3. Pearson v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Carden v. Missouri Intergovernmental Risk Management Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Jordan v. WillensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Green v. MissouriDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2010
  2. Ballandby v. PrecytheDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2019
  3. Goodwin v. Village of Oakview, MissouriDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API