Interdiction of Roddy
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
HAMITER Justice.
Four sisters, a brother, and a niece of John Roddy instituted this suit praying for the latter’s interdiction (because of alleged physical infirmities) and for reasonable attorney's fees. Later, other collateral relatives, by way of intervention, joined in the prayer.
Answering, the defendant affirmatively averred that “he is still in possession of all his mental faculties, although he is bedridden, and he is perfectly capable of managing his own affairs.” In reconvention he demanded damages “for mental pain and suffering, embarrassment and humiliation”, and additionally…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Doss v. Board of Com'rs of Mermentau Levee Dist.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- Ruiz v. PonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
- In re JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- In re LambertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
- City of New Orleans v. LakowskySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stephens v. StephensLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
- Arceneaux v. ArceneauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957