Legal Opinion

Arceneaux v. Arceneaux

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 25, 1957No. 43290Published

1Opinion

On Application for Rehearing

2Per curiam

In an application for rehearing counsel for appellee complain that we “erred in considering the life insurance policy mentioned and in considering the effect of the divorce judgment, the court *499not being called upon nor asked to rule with regard to those matters and those matters not being before the court for decision.” The complaint has merit, for the only question presented by the motion to dismiss the appeal (and on which we were entitled to rule) was whether or not the divorce action had abated on the death of plaintiff. See In re Lambert, 115 La. 469, 39 So.…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re LambertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  2. Interdiction of RoddySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API