Legal Opinion

Norton v. Sjolseth

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1906No. 6201PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the suipierior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered November 14, 1905, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action for specific performance.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

This is an action for specific performance. Plaintiffs alleged that the defendants entered into an agreement in writing with the firm of Kandall & Goodwin, whereby they engaged said firm as their agents to. sell certain specified real estate in Seattle; that for a valuable consideration, the exclusive right to sell the property was granted to. said agents for the period of seven days from January 28, 1905, and the defendants agreed to cause the property to. be conveyed by good and sufficient warranty deed to. the person or persons designated by said firm;' that said agents, in behalf of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chambers v. SeaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. State ex rel. Walker v. WalkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  3. Brown v. PforrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. SerensonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API