Legal Opinion
Huls v. Meyer
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 29, 2020No. 29084PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
#29084-dismiss-MES
2020 S.D. 24
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** MARK A. HULS, STEVEN E. PETERSON, CATHERINE M. PETERSON, and DAVID L. SKOGLUND, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. DAVID M. MEYER, NANCY R. MEYER, Defendants and Appellees, and MAGNUM 43, LLC, WINDMILL RIDGE, LLC, RAWHIDE, LLC, and REMINGTON, LLC, Defendants. **** APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MCCOOK COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA **** THE HONORABLE CHRIS S. GILES Judge **** MICHAEL E. UNKE Salem, South Dakota Attorney for plaintiffs and appellants. DANIEL R. FRITZ TIMOTHY R. RAHN of Ballard…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Knecht v. EvridgeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Ochs v. Northwestern National Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- MGA Ins. Co., Inc. v. GoodsellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Midcom, Inc. v. OehlerkingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nelson v. CampbellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Goens v. Fdt, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Koenig v. LondonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- First National Bank v. InghramSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Langbehn v. LangbehnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.