Legal Opinion

Harter Holding Co. v. Perkins

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1942No. 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, P. J.

The Geo. D. Harter Bank, a banking corporation organized under the laws of Ohio, with its principal place of business in Canton, Ohio, was “taken over” by the superintendent of banks of tlxe itate of Ohio, pursuant to a resolution of its board of directors, and under authority of the provisions of the statutes of Ohio. This transaction occurred oxi October 22, 1931, axxd the laws in force at that time govern the proceedings.

Thereafter, a committee of persons who represented depositors and stockholders prepared a plan for the reopening of the bank and the resumption of business. Upon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. N.J. Nat. Bk., C., Co. v. Lincoln, C., Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  2. First Natl Bank of Cincinnati v. RawsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. State Ex Rel. Black v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Seigle v. First National Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  5. Binns v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Papiernik v. PapiernikOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Toledo Trust Co. v. Toledo HospitalOhio Court of Appeals · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API