Legal Opinion

People v. Cates

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 23, 2009No. A121037PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMONS, J.

In October 2006, appellant Christopher Shane Cates was placed on probation after pleading no contest to a felonious assault on his former girlfriend. In March 2008, the trial court modified that probation, ordering appellant to attend and complete a 52-week batterer’s counseling program, even though he was performing satisfactorily at the time of the modification. The court reasoned that Penal Code section 1203.097 1 mandates imposition of the challenged condition, and the failure to impose it when probation was originally ordered in 2006 resulted in an unauthorized sentence…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. In Re MoserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. BraggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. People v. SELGACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. S.Y. v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. People v. Arce CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. People v. ForesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  4. People v. QualkinbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  5. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API