People v. Cates
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMONS, J.
In October 2006, appellant Christopher Shane Cates was placed on probation after pleading no contest to a felonious assault on his former girlfriend. In March 2008, the trial court modified that probation, ordering appellant to attend and complete a 52-week batterer’s counseling program, even though he was performing satisfactorily at the time of the modification. The court reasoned that Penal Code section 1203.097 1 mandates imposition of the challenged condition, and the failure to impose it when probation was originally ordered in 2006 resulted in an unauthorized sentence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re MoserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. BraggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. SELGACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- S.Y. v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. Arce CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. ForesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- People v. QualkinbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.