Childers v. Childers
California Court of Appeal
1ConcurrenceMcCOMB, J.
—I concur in the judgment for the reason stated: that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the implied findings. But I do not subscribe to the conclusion reached in the main opinion under the heading (1) Assumptions and implications when findings are waived.
In spite of the language in certain earlier decisions to the contrary, it is my opinion that the Supreme Court has now established the law in California to be that where findings of *64fact and conclusions of law are waived by the parties, on an appeal from the judgment an appellate court will presume that every fact essential to the support…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bekins Van Lines, Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Gray v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- California Employment Stabilization Commission v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Chrisman v. Culinary Workers' Local No. 62California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Sawyer v. Sterling Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.