Legal Opinion
Baker v. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided May 5, 2006No. CV-06-6-B-WPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY AND MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
WOODCOCK, District Judge.
Deanna Baker claims her former employer, Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. (Securitas), waived its contractual right to compel arbitration of her Maine Human Rights Act (MHRA) and state tort law claims by failing to file for arbitration when Ms. Baker initiated her MHRC complaint and instead waiting and only moving to compel arbitration after she later filed a civil claim in federal court. Concluding that the arbitration agreement is effective and has not been waived, this Court grants Securitas’…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Waffle House, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Marie v. Allied Home Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Jason Bercovitch v. Baldwin School, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Brennan v. KingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Unionmutual Stock Life Insurance Company of America v. Beneficial Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- LaSalle Group, Inc. v. Electromation of Delaware County, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Kourembanas v. Intercoast Colls.District Court, D. Maine · 2019
- Begley v. Fullana-MoralesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2021
- MOSS v. BROCK SERVICES LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
- STAPLES v. LIPPERT COMPONENTS INCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.