Legal Opinion

Dishler v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1964No. Appeal, 39PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Appellants, owners of two adjoining properties in Cheltenham Township, Montgomery County, located in an area zoned “AA” Residential, which allows only single-family dwellings, applied for the issuance of a variance to permit construction of an apartment building thereon. The zoning board of adjustment denied the application and its decision was affirmed by the court below. This appeal followed.

In order to establish the right to a variance, an applicant must prove: (1) An unnecessary hardship upon and which is unique or peculiar to the property involved, and (2) that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sheedy v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Cooper v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Hart AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Wilson v. Plumstead Twp. Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. McClure AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Marple Gardens, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Bilotta v. Haverford Township Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API