Legal Opinion

Pizel v. Whalen

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 22, 1993No. 67,652PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, J.:

This is a legal malpractice action brought by the potential beneficiaries of an inter vivos trust created by Charles Pizel, now deceased, against defendant attorneys B. E. Whalen and Eugene P. Zuspann. Trial by jury was had and judgment was entered in favor of the defendant. Plaintiffs appeal therefrom.

In 1962, attorney Eugene P. Zuspann prepared an inter vivos trust for Charles Pizel, a single man. Initially, the three trustees thereof were the settlor and two of his nephews, Allen and Wilfred Pizel. The deed transferring Charles’ real…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pizel v. ZuspannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  2. Pape Ex Rel. Johansen v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  3. Cruse v. DoleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  4. Pizel v. ZuspannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  5. Bartlett v. Davis CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. Price WaterhouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Puckett v. Mt. Carmel Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  3. National Bank of Andover v. Kansas Bankers Surety Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  4. Cox v. LeskoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  5. Kiser v. Building Erection Services, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API