Legal Opinion
William Schluderberg-T. J. Kurdle Co. v. Trice
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided April 23, 1956No. Record 4510PublishedCited by 10 opinions
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
The William Schluderberg-T. J. Kurdle Company, Inc., hereinafter called plaintiff, instituted action against Franklin A. Trice and E. W. Bell, hereinafter called defendants, to recover the sum of $2,403.51.
Plaintiff’s claim is based upon a guaranty given to it by defendants on June 3, 1954, which is incorporated in the written motion for judgment. The material parts of the guaranty follow:
“In consideration of your supplying Food Kraft, Inc., (Foodcraft Inc.) of 20 Shockoe Slip, Richmond, Virginia with goods in your line, upon credit, we, Franklin A. Trice and E. W. Bell do guarantee you the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kasco Mills, Inc. v. FerebeeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
- People's Bank v. People's National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
- Robinson v. Barrow-Penn & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1953
3Cited by10 opinions
- Virginia Impression Products Co., Inc. v. Scm Corporation, Virginia Impression Products Co., Inc. v. Scm CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- Williams v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- The Equitable Trust Company v. Bratwursthaus Management Corporation, and Francis J. Plombon and Patricia A. PlombonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Louis B. Houff, Jr., and C. E. Keefer, and Third-Party v. The C. F. Sauer Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Kim v. Peoples Federal S & L Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.