Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Barrow-Penn & Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 26, 1953No. Record No. 4009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

John T. Bobinson, an employee of Barrow-Penn and Company, Incorporated, instituted action against his employer under the Pair Labor Standards Act1 for overtime pay and damages that he claimed were owing to him.

Plaintiff asserted that during a period of 48 weeks while he was employed by defendant in 1950 and 1951, he worked 32 hours overtime each week, and had thus accumulated 1536 overtime hours. He sought to recover $1,958.40, which represented “pay at time and a half rate ’ ’ for the overtime claimed, and an equal sum as liquidated damages and reasonable attorney’s fees, all as allowed by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Levinson v. Spector Motor ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Morris v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Walling v. Mutual Wholesale Food & Supply Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kasco Mills, Inc. v. FerebeeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  2. William Schluderberg-T. J. Kurdle Co. v. TriceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API