Legal Opinion

Blake v. Blake

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 24, 1930No. [No. 57, April Term, 1930.]PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

The Orphans’ Court of Baltimore City decided that the appellants were without sufficient interest to caveat a codicil modifying a will under which they might become entitled to share, as contingent remaindermen, in certain trust estates, and their petition for leave to intervene in and prosecute the caveat, previously filed against the codicil, by a caveator who thereafter desired to discontinue the proceeding, was accordingly dismissed. The record on this appeal from the court’s order presents also a question as to the right of the original caveator to dismiss the caveat in view of an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brewer v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
  2. Johnston v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  3. Munnikhuysen v. MagrawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
  4. Helfrich v. YockelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923
  5. In re Banks' WillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Estate of PlautCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Low v. LowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Senk v. MorkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. Fry v. YeatmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  5. Zinn v. Imperial Council of the Ancient Arabic Order of the Nobles of the Mystic Shrine for North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API