Legal Opinion

Sekulski v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 18, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEADBETTER.

Claimant David Sekulski appeals from the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board), which affirmed the denial of his claim petition on the basis that claimant’s injury did not occur within the course and scope of his employment. The issue presented for review is whether claimant’s injury, which occurred when he was attacked by unknown assailants while walking home from a bowling alley while “on call,” occurred during the course and scope of his employment such that he is entitled to benefits under Section 301(c) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act),…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. U.S. Airways v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Lenzner Coach Lines v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Evans v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Weaver v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scott v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API