Frady v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Judge.
A jury found Cheyenne Junior Frady guilty of child molestation. He appeals, citing several enumerations of error. Having examined each of these issues and finding no error, we affirm.
1. Frady contends that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict and that the court erred in denying his motion for directed verdict. The test established in Jackson v. Virginia 1 is the proper test when the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged, even when that challenge arises from the overruling of a motion for directed verdict. 2(a) Frady first argues that the victim made no.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Cuzzort v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Woodard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Dent v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nelson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Standfill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Foster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Flanders v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.