Legal Opinion

Hollyfield v. Rovenger

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 5, 1953No. 3126PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This suit was brought by appellants against appellees for partition of the mineral estate in a tract of 30 acres of land in Hardin County. Appellants, Hollyfield and wife, alleged that they owned an undivided ½ of said mineral estate subject to their lease to appellant Mason; and that the appellees owned the other ½ thereof, to-wit, appellee Parker, %o, appellee Rov-*115enger %o, and the appellees, Ingalls heirs, ⅛.

The Trial Court, without the aid of a jury, determined that appellants own ⅜ instead of t/2; and that appellee Rovenger owns 3%oo instead of %o; and the other…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cochran County v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. Burton v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  3. Grassmeyer v. BeesonTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Sawyer v. First National Bank of HicoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  5. Hake v. DilworthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Callicoatte v. CallicoatteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API