Hollyfield v. Rovenger
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
McDONALD, Chief Justice.
This suit was brought by appellants against appellees for partition of the mineral estate in a tract of 30 acres of land in Hardin County. Appellants, Hollyfield and wife, alleged that they owned an undivided ½ of said mineral estate subject to their lease to appellant Mason; and that the appellees owned the other ½ thereof, to-wit, appellee Parker, %o, appellee Rov-*115enger %o, and the appellees, Ingalls heirs, ⅛.
The Trial Court, without the aid of a jury, determined that appellants own ⅜ instead of t/2; and that appellee Rovenger owns 3%oo instead of %o; and the other…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cochran County v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Burton v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Grassmeyer v. BeesonTexas Supreme Court · 1857
- Sawyer v. First National Bank of HicoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Hake v. DilworthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Callicoatte v. CallicoatteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967