Legal Opinion

Pfefferling v. Mayor of Baltimore

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 17, 1898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City (Sharp, J.), dismissing the bill of complaint. The bill prayed among other things that the comptroller of the city and the clerk of Lafayette market may be enjoined and required to issue to the plaintiff a license for the stall referred to, from May 1, 1897, to May 1, 1898.

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The appellant filed a bill in the Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City for an injunction to restrain the appel*476lees, the mayor and city council of Baltimore and certain of its officers, from interfering with his possession and control of a certain market stall which is particularly described in the proceedings. The defendant, Brown, answered, but the city demurred. However the sole question involved is whether the ordinance 'No. 129 of said city relating to the regulation of markets is a valid and constitutional exercise of legislative power.

It appears that the defendant, Brown, was duly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rose v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  2. Green v. Western National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Castle Farms Dairy Stores, Inc. v. Lexington Market AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  2. State v. BurkettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. ErcolanoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  4. Fonte v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  5. Fisher v. FonteBaltimore City Circuit Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API