Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Fonte

Baltimore City Circuit Court

Decided December 9, 1920Published

1Opinion of the CourtDawkins, J.

This case involves tile right to a street stall in Lexington Market. The bill seeks to enjoin the defendants from entering upon or enclosing any part of the stall of the complainant, or disturbing- her in the possession of her rights in the same.

The complainants have owned (so far as there can be ownership) the stall No. 1157 in said market for over 40 years, paying to the City the charges .and fees for the use of the same. The defendants, Messrs. Fonte and Alascia, own the adjacent eave stall in the said market. Notwithstanding the complainants’ objections to parting with any part of their…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rose v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  2. Green v. Western National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  3. Pfefferling v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  4. Hatch v. PendergastCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API