Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Lucas v. Pittsburgh Life & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 20, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sims, J.,

after making the foregoing statement, delivered the following opinion of the court:

The questions presented by the assignment of error will be disposed of in their order as stated below.

1. Is the decree under review erroneous in its holding that the plaintiff is not entitled upon the facts appearing in the record before us to any relief in this suit against the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company?

The question must be answered in the negative.

The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company defended upon two grounds only,—

*2691st. That proof of the alleged death of the assured has not been furnished.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. Security Life Insurance & Annuity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Carr v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Snyder v. Supreme Ruler of the Fraternal Mystic CircleTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney General v. American Life Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  5. Johnson v. ButtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Insurance v. Massachusetts Accident Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Federico MacAroni Mfg. v. Great Western Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  3. Page v. MarcelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Seaboard Fire & Marine Insurance Co. of New York v. HurstSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  5. Western Life Indemnity Co. v. BartlettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API