United States v. Jeffrey Scott Amos
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
The question presented in this case is whether the recently enacted Insanity De fense Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 20, 4241-4247 (Supp.1984) violates the due process clause of the fifth amendment by unconstitutionally shifting to the defendant, the burden of proving insanity by clear and convincing evidence. We conclude that it does not, and therefore affirm the judgment of the district court. 1
I
Appellant, Jeffrey Scott Amos, was convicted of transporting a victim of kidnapping in interstate commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1201 and with the use of a firearm during and in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. HolderCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
- State v. HoltonTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. PerryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
- United States v. Pershing DubrayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Larry Charles ByrdCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.