State ex rel. More v. District Court
Montana Supreme Court
Original application for writ of certiorari by tbe state on. tbe relation of A. M. More to review tbe action of tbe district court of Hill county and John W. Tattan, a judge thereof, in directing a liquor license theretofore issued to relator to be canceled.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway
delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.
On July 21, 1914, A. M. More presented to the board of county commissioners of Hill county bis petition, duly signed *578by the required number of qualified freeholders, requesting that a license be issued to him to engage in the retail liquor business at Hingham, Montana. Due notice was given, and on August 25 Frank Spaulding and twenty-eight other freeholders residing within the village of Hingham presented their protest. After a hearing the board on September 16 granted the petition and ordered the license to issue. On September 19 Spaulding, alone of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Arthurs v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1911
- State ex rel. Lang v. FurnishMontana Supreme Court · 1913
- State ex rel. Hackshaw v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by5 opinions
- Grant v. MichaelsMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- Lane v. FergusonArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- State Ex Rel. Stewart v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1936
- In re PepperNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1947
- Honstain v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1916