Legal Opinion
DRR, L.L.C. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 19, 1997No. Civil Action No. 94-401 MMSPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION & FACTUAL BACKGROUND
In July of 1994, DRR, L.L.C. (“DRR”), filed suit against Sears, Roebuck & Co. (“Sears”) for reasons recounted in a recent opinion by this Court. See DRR, L.L.C., v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 949 F.Supp. 1132 (D.Del.1996). Count I of DRR’s complaint alleged fraud, and Count II alleged strict liability. Docket Item. (“D.I.”) 1. Sears counterclaimed. D.I. 6. In Count I of the counterclaim, Sears alleged DRR is contractually obligated to indemnify Sears from all costs arising from this lawsuit. Id. at Till1-6. Count…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Susan Waltman v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- John W. Dussouy, Jr. v. Gulf Coast Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Vicom, Inc. v. Harbridge Merchant Services, Inc., as Successor in Interest to Peach Tree Bancard Corporation, Judy Elliot, James ElliotCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Bank of Waunakee, a Wisconsin Banking Corporation v. Rochester Cheese Sales, Inc., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brown v. General Electric Capital Corp. (In Re Foxmeyer Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2002
- In Re WechslerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2000
- Hess v. FernandezWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Hirmiz v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Rochez Bros. v. Sears Ecological Applications Co. (In Re Rochez Bros.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.