Legal Opinion

Reed v. Reed

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 1, 1922No. 3744PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. Suit for separate maintenance by Clara C. Reed against Daniel M. Reed. From an order overruling defendant’s motion to reduce the award of temporary alimony, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

SMYTH, Chief Justice.

This suit by Clara C. Reed, wife of the appellant, was for separate maintenance under section 980 of the Code. In her bill she charged, among other things, that her husband was earning in the neighborhood of $250 a month; that he had been contributing to the support of their house $150 each month, but suddenly reduced the allowance to $50 each half month, and then to $40, informing her at the same time that she should have no more; and that this was not enough to meet the usual family expenses. She asked for an order requiring him to pay her reasonable alimony pending the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duncan Townsite Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Ex Parte Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Wygodsky v. WygodskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1919

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pedersen v. PedersenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. Howard v. HowardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  3. Bates v. ColpoysCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  4. DeSipio v. DeSipioDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Garrett v. GarrettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API