Legal Opinion

Parker v. Hyde & Behman Amusement Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, sixth district, borough of Manhattan, rendered in favor of the plaintiff after a trial before the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

The action was brought to recover the sum of $250, being the amount provided in the contract for the plaintiff’s services under a theatrical engagement with the defendant. The agreement was in writing, dated Hovember 2, 1905, for a term of one week commencing Hovember 20, 1905; and by its terms the plaintiff agreed “to render satisfactory services in her specialties at two performances each day ” of the week in question. The contract was on a printed form with the blanks filled in. Among the words so written in the blank.spaces is the word “ satisfactory.” The contract contains some…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crawford v. . Mail Express Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Smith v. . RobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Fisher v. MonroeNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
  4. Gallo v. Mayor of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  5. DeVere v. GilmoreCity of New York Municipal Court · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Saxe v. Shubert Theatrical Co.New York Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Saxe v. Shubert Theatrical Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API