Legal Opinion

Stephen Ralls, Esq., Witness-Appellant v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 4, 1995No. 94-16344PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHOY, Circuit Judge:

Stephen Ralls, Esq. (“Ralls”), a criminal defense attorney, appeals the district court’s order denying in part his motion to quash a grand jury subpoena which required him to provide information regarding a client/fee-payer. Ralls also appeals from the district court’s order holding him in contempt for failure to provide information pursuant to court orders.

Upon examination of Ralls’ sealed affidavit, we find that the client/fee-payer’s identity and the fee arrangements are inextricably linked to privileged communications and are therefore privileged. Having jurisdiction…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Baird v. KoernerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  3. Dennis Rosa Collazo v. Wayne Estelle, Warden, California Mens ColonyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Raymond M. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena For: William Lathan Osterhoudt, Luxana Phaksuan. Luxana Phaksuan, Movant-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. RuehleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. BauerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. In Re: Queen's University at KingstonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  4. Laser Industries, Ltd. v. Reliant Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Koster v. CainMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API