Stephen Ralls, Esq., Witness-Appellant v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
Stephen Ralls, Esq. (“Ralls”), a criminal defense attorney, appeals the district court’s order denying in part his motion to quash a grand jury subpoena which required him to provide information regarding a client/fee-payer. Ralls also appeals from the district court’s order holding him in contempt for failure to provide information pursuant to court orders.
Upon examination of Ralls’ sealed affidavit, we find that the client/fee-payer’s identity and the fee arrangements are inextricably linked to privileged communications and are therefore privileged. Having jurisdiction…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Baird v. KoernerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Dennis Rosa Collazo v. Wayne Estelle, Warden, California Mens ColonyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Raymond M. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena For: William Lathan Osterhoudt, Luxana Phaksuan. Luxana Phaksuan, Movant-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. RuehleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. BauerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- In Re: Queen's University at KingstonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Laser Industries, Ltd. v. Reliant Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1996
- State ex rel. Koster v. CainMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.